Chapter 2

DEMOGRAPHIC AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE 

2.1.  Demographic Characteristics

Urban/rural distribution:

Currently, more than two thirds of Armenian Population lives in designated urban areas, therefore we selectively involved more inhabitants of the towns and cities in the survey and case studies. In total, there were 863 (48%) rural and 937 (52%) urban respondents of the survey, including 660 (37%) from Yerevan and 277 (15%) from urban areas of the Ararat Region (Figure 2.1). The majority (83%) of respondents of the case studies were from urban areas.

Figure 2.1. Urban/rural distribution of respondents of the survey and case-studies 

Survey (n=1800)

Case studies (n=150)

Religious belief:

The majority of adults (97%) and young people (95%) involved in the survey, as well as all young respondents of the case studies (100%) considered themselves Christians by culture. 

Age and sex distribution: 

Survey data

The age of 900 young participants of the survey varied from 13 to 24 years old (Median = 17) and of 900 adult participants - from 25 to 71 years old (Median = 40). The largest group (31%) of the total survey population was composed of 564 young people 15-19 years old (Figure 2.2). 

Figure 2.2. The frequency distribution of the survey respondents, by age

(n=1800)

 

 

Table 2.1. represents details on the frequency and percentage distribution of the survey participants by gender and age. It is obvious from Table 2.1. that proportion of male respondents in the survey sample was smaller than of females. Thus, there were 40% of males among young people and only 14.7% among the adult respondents.

This fact may be explained by several reasons: 1) most of the teachers and health providers of the Armenian educational institutions and public health facilities are women; 2) mainly mothers and women guardians take care of children and were available for interview; 3) it was difficult to reach adult males at their home during the daytime; 4) the refusal rate for participation in the survey was higher among males compared to females.

Case studies data

The age of 150 participants of the case studies varied from 14 to 24 years old (Median = 16.5). The proportion of females was more than twice of proportion of males in the groups “A” (which included young people who participated in training courses on sexuality, and sexual and reproductive health) and “B” (which received relevant information from previously trained peer educators. However, there were more boys than girls in the target group “C”, participants of which didn’t have an access to accurate information on sexuality, and sexual and reproductive health (Table 2.2).

Table 2.1. The frequency and percentage distribution of the survey respondents,

 by gender and age (n=1800) 

Respondents

Females

Males

Total

abs.

%

abs.

%

abs.

%

Young People

 

< 15

81

61

52

39

133

100

15 – 19

332

59

232

41

564

100

20 – 24

126

62

77

38

203

100

Total for young people:

539

60

361

40

900

100

 

Adults above 25 years of age

 

25 – 29

109

81

25

19

134

100

30 – 34

110

93

8

7

118

100

35 – 39

150

88

21

12

171

100

40 – 44

161

86

26

14

187

100

45 – 49

109

83

22

17

131

100

>= 50

129

81

30

19

159

100

Total for adults:

768

85

132

15

900

100

OVERALL:

1307

73

493

27

1800

100

 

Table 2.2. The frequency and percentage distribution of participants

 of the case studies, by gender (n=150) 

Target groups

Females

Males

Total

abs.

%

abs.

%

abs.

%

Group “A”

34

68

16

32

50

100

Group “B”

35

70

15

30

50

100

Group “C”

19

38

31

62

50

100

TOTAL:

88

58

62

42

150

100

 

Marital status

Survey data

By the time of this survey, the great majority (86%) of young people have never been married, while most (90%) of the adult respondents over 24 years of age have been ever married. The frequency and percentage distribution of participants of the survey, according to their marital status at the time of interview is demonstrated in Table 2.3, below.

   Table 2.3. The frequency and percentage distribution

 of the survey respondents, by marital status (n=1800)

Marital status

Adults

Young people

Total

Abs.

%

Abs.

%

Abs.

%

Currently married, living with spouse

682

76

37

4

719

80

Currently married, but separated

41

5

20

2

61

4

Widowed

50

6

0

0

50

3

Divorced

35

4

2

0,2

37

2

Never married

85

9

776

86

861

48

Consensual union

2

0,2

6

0.7

8

0.4

Single mothers

5

0,5

0

0

5

0.3

Total:

900

100

900

100

1800

100

Case studies data

Among 150 participants of the case studies only 3 (2%) girls were currently married and lived with spouse. The remaining 147 (98%) respondents have never been married.     

2.2.  Social and Economic Status

Education

Survey data

Almost 43 percent of young participants of the survey were students at public schools, 22 percent at colleges, and 21 percent at universities or institutes.  But 112 young people (12%) were out of educational institution (completed or dropped out), 11 (1%) - lived in orphanages or boarding schools for children in need of special protection (Table 2.4).

Table 2.4. The frequency and percentage distribution

 of young respondents of the survey, by educational status (n=900) 

Educational Status

Number of respondents

abs.

%

Students of the public schools

390

43

Students of the colleges

199

22

Students of the universities/institutes

188

21

Out of any educational institution (completed                                    or dropped out from the public schools)

112

12

Institutionalized children

11

1

Total:

900

100

The educational level of the adult respondents of the survey was quite high: about 53% had a university level education and 36% had completed college or technical school. There were 325 (36%) health providers and 223 (25%) teachers/educators among participants of the survey. 

Case studies data

The majority (95%) of participants of the case studies were students. There were 113 (75%) students at public schools, 17 (11%) - at colleges, and 13 (9%) - at universities, as well 7 (5%) young people out of any educational institution (Table 2.5). 

        Table 2.5. The frequency and percentage distribution

 of participants of the case studies, by educational status

(n=150) 

Educational Status

Number of  respondents

abs.

%

Students of the public schools

113

75

Students of the colleges

17

11

Students of the universities/institutes

13

9

Out of any educational institution (completed                                    or dropped out from the public schools)

7

5

Total:

150